- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 12:14:06 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28041
Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl
--- Comment #2 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> ---
It wasn't immediately obvious to me that the term set had that meaning, but it
makes sense now.
The section in F&O you refer to starts with
"All functions defined in this specification are ·deterministic· unless
otherwise stated. Exceptions include the following:".
But if we look up the said functions (fn:unordered), it is deemed deterministic
and there is no notion that it is non-deterministic in regards to ordering. I
am unsure whether this is a closed set of functions or not and whether it
applies to extension functions like the ones we define in XSLT.
Does it perhaps make sense to add a line something like "this function is
non-deterministic with respect to ordering" and/or refer to that section in
F&O?.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2015 12:14:11 UTC