- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 14:28:07 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26649 --- Comment #2 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> --- Well, the comment on "1.2 to 3.4+" was meant to signify that the current text (prior to introducing EBNF) does not mention it, nor does it explicitly forbid it. With the EBNF, that syntax becomes explicitly allowed. Of course, like you wrote, it is just a clumsy way of writing "1.2+". If we want to explicitly disallow that syntax, I can alter the EBNF. But I think allowing it is fine, the explanation of the syntax is clear enough and not having an example of this edge case does not hurt. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 5 September 2014 14:28:11 UTC