- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 19:02:58 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27171
Christian Gruen <christian.gruen@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Christian Gruen <christian.gruen@gmail.com> ---
> We have only one way to specify a JSON null, and that's an empty sequence.
> So I think serializing as 'null' is appropriate here.
After some thoughts, I also came to the conclusion that serializing an empty
sequence as 'null' also makes sense on top level (otherwise, serialization and
parsing would not be bidirectional anymore).
> I agree that we should not serialize a sequence of length > 1 as an array. The WG agreed to that yesterday.
Thanks for pointing this out; I'm closing this issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2014 19:03:00 UTC