- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 17:33:06 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21893
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com
--- Comment #9 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> ---
For the record: as the reopener of the issue, Tim Mills is asked to consider
the resolution of the issue, and to signal his assent to this resolution by
closing the bug (or, if necessary, his dissent, by reopening it). If the bug
has not been closed by the time the WG prepares to progress the specifications,
silence will be interpreted as assent
Also for the record: it took the WG some little time to realize that the three
sentences in the status-quo text of numbered item 2 in the first bullet item in
section 3.1.5.2 are not to be taken as sequential instructions, but the second
and third sentences are to be read as expanding on the instruction given in the
first sentence and supplying details (and/or special cases / exceptions). We
hope that the wording finally adopted helps make the logical relation clear.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2014 17:33:07 UTC