- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:30:28 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27051 --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- I'm a little surprised to hear that the spec at one time allowed this. While it's clear that it can be made to work, I'm a bit worried about whether it's well grounded in the theory. My basic concerns are that when we evaluate a template rule for streamability, we assume the context posture is striding. But in this case the select expression that selected the nodes is climbing. If we work through all the combinations of what you can do with the nodes, it seems that all the permitted actions make sense, but it still doesn't feel right to make this switch from climbing to striding as we enter the called template. And is this the only place where this occurs? What about other places where we require (and assume) striding expressions, such as for-each and for-each-group and iterate? Is it safe to use attribute::* in all these contexts, on the same basis? If so, perhaps we should change the table in 9.8.7.7 so that selecting attributes or namespaces from a striding origin gives a striding result? (And perhaps selecting them from a crawling origin also gives a striding result?) We could then also consider improving the rules for union expressions so that *|@* is striding: the rule would perhaps be that if both operands are striding if at most one operand can select elements, then the result is striding. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 24 October 2014 16:30:29 UTC