- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 15:27:58 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27078 --- Comment #3 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> --- Just checked how we did it, we indeed return a namespace on namespace-node()/self::node(). So, indeed, I misinterpreted the rules on principal node kind for these tests. I will update them. I agree that I don't think it is worthwhile to optimized attribute()/descendant-or-self::node(), we already optimize attribute()/descendant::node() (empty sequence) and that seems to be good enough for me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 16 October 2014 15:28:20 UTC