- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 02:23:42 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27040 Bug ID: 27040 Summary: Use the word "identity" in its ordinary English meaning Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Last Call drafts Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Data Model 3.1 Assignee: ndw@nwalsh.com Reporter: cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com QA Contact: public-qt-comments@w3.org Created attachment 1522 --> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=1522&action=edit List of changes proposed Most uses of the words "identity" and "identical" in our specs make sense to readers who approach them from the ordinary English meanings of the words; a few uses rely on a specialized usage of the terms which some WG members have reported is common in discussions of object-oriented programming. Those passages make very little sense to readers who endeavor to understand them using the ordinary tools for establishing the meaning of words in a text, like dictionaries. I propose that we reword some sections of our specifications to avoid relying on domain-specific meanings for terms not defined in our specifications. I am opening this bug against XDM, but in fact the passages I believe we should change appear also in Functions and Operators, XQuery, XSLT, and XQuery Requirements and use cases; some passages in XPath might also be rephrased but I don't think they are urgent. Attached is a list of passages I believe should change and proposed wording for each of them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2014 02:23:45 UTC