- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 13:50:27 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27001 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Liam R E Quin from comment #5) > This is not the same usage as mathematical identity, but is very common in > programming language design and specification. Not all languages use the > term "identity" for this concept, however. Perhaps we should rather say > haecceity, "this-one-ness". Not all programming languages use the term 'haecceity' for this either ;-> But I agree that this discussion is parallel to the philosophical discussion of haecceity and quiddity - see http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/medieval-haecceity/ for a good introduction. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 10 October 2014 13:50:29 UTC