- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 20:29:38 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27336
Bug ID: 27336
Summary: date-094 and date-095 test family
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Last Call drafts
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XSLT 3.0 Test Suite
Assignee: abel.online@xs4all.nl
Reporter: mike@saxonica.com
QA Contact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
A number of problems with these new date/time tests.
date-094j says 0400-02-29 is invalid because 0400 is not a leap year. Wrong, it
is a leap year.
date-094m says -0400-02-29 is valid because -0400 is a leap year. This depends
on whether there is a year 0, which depends on whether you follow XSD 1.0 or
XSD 1.1
date-094n also depends on year 0 therefore choice of XSD version
date-094o ditto
date-094p uses a different date in the input from that expected in the output
date-094q claims 0400 is not a leap year. Oh yes it is.
date-095m - sane problem as date-094m
date-095n - sane problem as date-094n
date-095o - sane problem as date-094o
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 15 November 2014 20:29:40 UTC