- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 15:51:02 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26861 --- Comment #3 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- The precedent is there because many of the tests were written before we had the ability to define fine-grained dependencies. Adding an error as a possible result is that it makes it very easy for test failures to go unnoticed, since generating the wrong error code is not something that gets reported as a test failure. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 14 November 2014 15:51:06 UTC