- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 18:28:13 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26958 --- Comment #28 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- >There is no ambiguity as long as we preclude updates on the instances that are created. Perhaps we have a different understanding of the word preclude? My understanding is it means "to make impossible". The requirement is that we shall not do anything that makes updates impossible. I think we can achieve this by doing nothing. Your objection, going back to the original comment in this bug entry, is that doing nothing "results in two sets of behavior that can be distinguished only when updates are implemented". I don't think that's a problem; the time to define the detail of how updates work is when we design the update facility, not now. Many people (for example, most XPath/XSLT implementors) will never implement in-situ update, and it would be entirely wrong for specs other than the Update spec to attempt to dictate choices that have no effect on non-Update programs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2014 18:28:14 UTC