- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:03:56 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25137 --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- Another problem with the definition of identity: it appears to be aiming at a rather strong test for values being indistinguishable, for example it requires atomic values to have exactly the same type annotation, but yet it ignores some factors that are easily distinguishable but do not contribute to equality tests, such as the prefix for QName values, and the timezone for dateTime values. It also makes NaN not identical to itself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 24 March 2014 18:03:58 UTC