- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 15:44:00 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24619
Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl
--- Comment #3 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> ---
An alternative way forward, which would be potentially less disruptive, is to
introduce static AVTs on all static attributes. It might look more natural to
users that are already used to AVTs, it seems like a smaller change to apply
and it doesn't change the schema.
The downside is: how to tell the difference between a static AVT and a
non-static one. But since currently there is no visual difference between a
static and non-static attribute when no AVT is applied, this may be less a
problem than it looks.
Another downside is backward compatibility for attributes that currently accept
paired accolades/curly braces as valid content.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 6 March 2014 15:44:05 UTC