- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 09:32:28 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24317 --- Comment #8 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- I'm going to push back on the idea of allowing xsl:for-each as a child instruction. I don't think it achieves anything useful; I don't think the streamability rules would be any different for an xsl:for-each appearing as a child of xsl:fork than for any other xsl:for-each instruction. I have applied the changes to allow xsl:for-each-group as a child of xsl:fork. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 6 June 2014 09:32:30 UTC