- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:00:40 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24140 --- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- The current language is: When the selected item is an atomic value or function item ... [or] when the selected item is an attribute node, text node, comment node, processing instruction node, or namespace node.... The sequence constructor is not evaluated, and must not generate any type errors. The wording of the last sentence in 2.0 was simply: The sequence constructor, if present, is not evaluated. I'm going to propose that we move back to the 2.0 wording, and remove the phrase "and must not generate any type errors"; I can't think of any sensible way of distinguishing the kind of type errors it makes sense to raise from those it doesn't. In fact I would propose another change, to say: The sequence constructor is not evaluated. on the grounds that the sequence constructor is always present (it may be empty, but it's always there). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2014 18:00:42 UTC