- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 11:53:57 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24342 --- Comment #1 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> --- Response in the xsl-wg mailing list from Michael Kay [1] was as follows: Yes, something has clearly gone wrong here. I suspect that the intent was that the "Otherwise" in rule 4 was intended to handle the case where one of (1a, 2a, or 3a) apply, while the "Otherwise" outside the list was intended to handle the case where none of these apply. There was probably some refactoring that went wrong. [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xsl-wg/2014Jan/0015.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 21 January 2014 11:53:59 UTC