[Bug 24308] Overriding templates can also be matching templates, but this case has no rules in the spec

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24308

--- Comment #2 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> ---
Apologies, I missed the line "These may appear only as children of the
xsl:override element within the xsl:use-package element." under 3.6.3.

However, I leave the bug open, because it leaves the questions on #all and
#unnamed (and to some extend, #default). More importantly, since only named
templates are allowed, this seems to be too much a restriction. 

In addition, I think we should allow the use of a mode from a used package on
the stylesheet level (I don't see why not). When you add a matching template,
you are extending or overriding it. Forcing it to be in xsl:override seems
counter-intuitive.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 16 January 2014 15:36:32 UTC