- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:52:55 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24234 --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- On the first point, I agree. For named modes we should add the statement that the effective value is the default value if no value is specified. One the second point, I think that conflicts should only be reported between explicit attribute values. That's what the spec currently says (it talks about the "values" of the attributes, not the "effective values"), and I think it's the right thing to say. It's consistent with other declarations that allow the attributes to be spread across multiple declarations (such as xsl:output and xsl:decimal-format). There's no point in allowing multiple declarations of a mode at the same import precedence if we require all information on one of the declarations to be exactly replicated in the others. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 13 January 2014 20:52:58 UTC