https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24200 Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmdyck@ibiblio.org --- Comment #3 from Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> --- It looks like we use 'TypeDeclaration' when specifying the type of a variable or parameter, and 'as SequenceType' when specifying the return type of a function or function-type. I think it would look somewhat odd (possibly confusing) to replace 'as SequenceType' with 'TypeDeclaration' in the latter productions. So, to answer the initial question, I suspect it's not an omission (or oversight) that 'TypeDeclaration' isn't used everywhere it could be. And I'm inclined to think it doesn't need "fixing" in 3.1. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.Received on Tuesday, 7 January 2014 18:36:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:45 UTC