- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:06:25 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24384
Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ---
Discussed by the WG, closed with the following action:
1. "is a thus a". Fixed in both 3.0 and 3.1.
2. The generation of links to functions is automated and I agree it's very
clumsy. However, it's been unchanged for a long time (since pre-2.0) and
there's no immediate urgency, so not fixing this right now.
3. We believe that unparsed-text-available() does indeed apply to
unparsed-text-lines(). The linkage is there, but is indirect: the specification
of unparsed-text-lines makes clear that it fails under exactly the same
circumstances as unparsed-text, and these are exactly the circumstances under
which unparsed-text-available returns false. I have added a statement to this
effect as a Note in both 3.0 and 3.1:
"Since the function <function>unparsed-text-lines</function> succeeds or fails
under exactly the same circumstances as <function>unparsed-text</function>, the
<function>unparsed-text-availabl</function> function may equally be used to
test whether a call on <function>unparsed-text-lines</function> would succeed."
4. The mismatched parentheses in the code example have been fixed (in 3.0 and
3.1).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2014 09:06:27 UTC