- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:49:29 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24543
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> ---
We discussed this issue briefly in Prague and concluded that some
implementations might indeed have trouble with the situation described, but
that others might be well able to handle it. In view of the latter, most of
the WG was disinclined to introduce an error for the situation. (Processors
which need to can of course issue their own message.)
The WG accepted comment 1.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2014 10:49:30 UTC