- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:28:40 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24541
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> ---
The WG discussed this during the ftf meeting in Prague and concluded that a
note or some expository text in the opening text of 19.8.7 might serve the
case, pointing out that as a consequence of the rule of classifying by the most
specific production for which an entry appears, expressions like
processing-instruction() should be sought not under KindTest (which does not
appear) but under AxisStep (which does). And similarly for child::x, which
should be analysed not under PathExpr but (again) under AxisStep (which is more
specific).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2014 10:28:46 UTC