- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:27:28 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24521
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> ---
We discussed this issue in Prague.
The current definition of 'core functions' appears to need updating to include
all the functions in F and O, not just the fn:* functions. (Constructors may
need special attention.)
On consideration, we leaned toward defining 'core functions' to include fn:*
and math:* and map:* and to exclude constructor 'functions' and the op:*
pseudo-namespace.
In connection with the last paragraph of the issue, the WG inclined to believe
that the right solution would be to specify that the set of available documents
is empty, or restricted in some way (e.g. no file: URIs). It would probably be
useful to have a note mentioning this and specifying that implementations are
allowed to restrict the dynamic context.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2014 08:27:34 UTC