- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:57:19 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24307 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> --- The WG discussed this during the ftf meeting in Prague. We accepted the proposal in the original bug report (without making a choice among the alternatives raised) and that in comment 1. We considered two ways of addressing the issue in comment 2: 1 we could say that everything is implicitly public in the top-level package. 2 we could say that when an xsl:stylesheet element is not wrapped in an xsl:package element, the implicit transformation which turns it into a package effectively wraps it in an xsl:package element with an xsl:expose names="*" for all relevant component types (templates, functions, modes). Of these, the first troubled some members of the WG because the difference between top-level and library packages is not lexically apparent; the second seemed to work fine (and to be compatible with stylesheets which have marked individual components as private). We agreed to adopt the second proposal. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 10 February 2014 11:57:20 UTC