- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:57:19 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24307
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> ---
The WG discussed this during the ftf meeting in Prague.
We accepted the proposal in the original bug report (without making a choice
among the alternatives raised) and that in comment 1.
We considered two ways of addressing the issue in comment 2:
1 we could say that everything is implicitly public in the top-level package.
2 we could say that when an xsl:stylesheet element is not wrapped in an
xsl:package element, the implicit transformation which turns it into a package
effectively wraps it in an xsl:package element with an xsl:expose names="*" for
all relevant component types (templates, functions, modes).
Of these, the first troubled some members of the WG because the difference
between top-level and library packages is not lexically apparent; the second
seemed to work fine (and to be compatible with stylesheets which have marked
individual components as private).
We agreed to adopt the second proposal.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 10 February 2014 11:57:20 UTC