- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 13:09:31 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24528 --- Comment #2 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> --- I think the point I was trying to make is that we have rules for Classifying Patterns, and that these rules do not apply to xsl:number, because either the patterns are applied to a grounded note (hence you can use a free-ranging pattern except for bound vars), or they are free-ranging (meaning, even a classified pattern is not allowed). This distinction between patterns elsewhere and patterns in xsl:number is not clear, though when you follow the rules to the letter, you won't really hit this problem. It is just confusing. Suggestions for improvement: under Classifying Patterns, we could write that they do not apply to patterns in xsl:number. Vice versa, under xsl:number we could write that the section classifying patterns does not apply. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 7 February 2014 13:09:33 UTC