- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 10:41:50 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24532 --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- I believe that document order on two nodes within a streamed document is perfectly well defined, and indeed it is fundamental to streaming that it should be well defined. We have however severely restricted the ability to process two nodes in a streamed document simultaneously, and therefore to ask questions about the relative order of two such nodes, because it's in the nature of streaming that we only process one node at a time. The expression (A << B) is disallowed (free-ranging) if A and B are both consuming or if either is free-ranging. But I think this leaves expressions like (.. << .) well defined and streamable. Indeed I think that (. << child::author) is probably permitted (and is consuming), provided there is only one author; though it's a pretty useless thing to write. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 10:41:54 UTC