- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 17:19:53 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27715
Bug ID: 27715
Summary: [XPath31] editorial: PostfixLookup: leftover wording
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Candidate Recommendation
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: XPath 3.1
Assignee: jonathan.robie@gmail.com
Reporter: jmdyck@ibiblio.org
QA Contact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
In 3.11.3.2 "Postfix Lookup", it says:
The semantics of E?S are equivalent to
for $a in E, $b in S return $a($b) ,
where E is an expression on the left of the postfix ? operator
and ?S is the unary lookup operator described in 3.11.3.1 Unary Lookup.
That last line (about ?S) is left over from when E?S was defined in terms of
UnaryLookup, which it isn't any more, so delete it.
The line before that (about E) is still true, but seems to be stating the
obvious, so should either be deleted or made more useful.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 30 December 2014 17:19:55 UTC