- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 16:00:46 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27668
Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl
--- Comment #1 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> ---
There's a potential subtlety that we may need to carefully examine if we are
making this change (which in principal seems a sound one), consider:
(self::p, @lang)
- both striding and motionless
- potentially consuming
- with new rule, this remains motionless and striding
string((self::p, @lang))
- inner expr is motionless and striding
- under 1.b.iii.A we say: if type U is not element/document, then U' is
inspection
After this proposed change, the above expression hits an ambiguity, as there is
no more "a type", but there is now a "collection of types" (attribute and
element nodes), of which one would yield U' inspection, and the other would
yield U' absorption.
Obviously, the result of string((self::p, @lang)) must be consuming (and
streamable).
I *think* that this is covered under 19.2 Determining the Static Type of a
Construct, but in the GSR we speak of "The static type T", while in fact this
is a union of several types.
Perhaps that under 1.a.i. we could remove this ambiguity by not talking of a
static type T, but of determining the union U{t1, t2...} of the construct.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 25 December 2014 16:00:48 UTC