- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 09:38:55 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27180
Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |---
--- Comment #11 from Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> ---
(In reply to Botond Biró from comment #10)
> (In reply to O'Neil Delpratt from comment #9)
> > Correction made according to comment 8
>
> I think for the testcases cbcl-castable-long-001, cbcl-castable-long-002,
> cbcl-castable-unsignedLong-001 the changes were incorrect - the expected
> result should be assert-false and not the overflow error.
> In my understanding, the castable as expressions should not fail if the lhs
> expression was evaluated successfully.
I agree. Prior to the change, the test expected only false.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 19 December 2014 09:39:00 UTC