- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 16:55:01 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26328 --- Comment #5 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- In discussion: (a) if the template isn't consuming, we should be able to use either acc-before() or acc-after() at any point - this means the before-value has to be remembered. (b) we could give effect to this by saying (i) acc-before must not have a preceding sibling that is consuming; (ii) acc-after must not have a following-sibling that is consuming. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 14 August 2014 16:55:07 UTC