- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:21:46 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25316 --- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- Disregard what I said about patterns. For patterns, our aim is to ensure that the predicate is NOT numeric. For this purpose, disallowing pathological cases like P[count(@*)] is fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 10 April 2014 21:21:47 UTC