[Bug 23643] Convenient operator for transform expressions

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23643

--- Comment #4 from Christian Gruen <christian.gruen@gmail.com> ---
Mike, thanks for the response. I also think that a higher-order approach could
offer a comparable solution, provided that the syntax gets more concise at some
stage (the FtanSkrit proposal looks compelling). 

As the modification of nodes in main-memory has got a very basic operation,
looking at our user feedback and our use cases, and as the effort for
specifying and implementing the extension is minimal, I still believe it could
deserve its own operator, as the existing solution is just too clumsy. If one
single keyword can be used, "modify" may be the better choice?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Monday, 28 October 2013 13:09:24 UTC