[Bug 23894] MUSTs and MAYs in a Note in 3.3 Extension Attributes

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23894

Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ---
I have removed all RFC markup from notes.

Most of it was doing no harm: it was either "mays" and "shoulds" which don't
really have any normative force anyway, or "musts" that explained the
consequences of "musts" already stated normatively. But removing the markup
avoids any arguments.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 28 November 2013 18:22:59 UTC