[Bug 21568] Incorrect expected result for FOTS tests function-decl-reserved-function-names-001,function-decl-reserved-function-names-003,...

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21568

Ghislain Fourny <g@28.io> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |g@28.io

--- Comment #9 from Ghislain Fourny <g@28.io> ---
> My understanding is that for submitting results for XQuery 3.0 only
> test-cases marked with "XQ10+", "XQ30" and "XQ30+" should matter.

This is also my understanding.

> Am I missing something here?
> 
> Doesn't "XQ10" dependency stand for XQuery 1.0 test-cases that *may be*
> incompatible with XQuery 3.0 ?

Yes, XQ10 tests (without the plus), I think, correspond to incompatibilities
with XQuery 3.0 (as in this case).

> Because this is not the case since the test-cases mentioned (although marked
> with "XQ10" dependency) are taken into account when generating XQuery 3.0
> conformance reports.

I can also see these XQ10 tests displayed in the conformance report. Could
there be a bug in the XSLT template?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2013 07:43:38 UTC