W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > May 2013

[Bug 21568] Incorrect expected result for FOTS tests function-decl-reserved-function-names-001,function-decl-reserved-function-names-003,...

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 23:45:54 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-21568-523-Aku6D1SJ3v@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21568

Sorin Nasoi <spungi@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
                 CC|                            |spungi@gmail.com
         Resolution|FIXED                       |---

--- Comment #8 from Sorin Nasoi <spungi@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> See also bugs 8713 and 20902.
> 
> Noted during discussion today that the resolution of bug 20902 represents an
> official interpretation of the XQuery 1.0 specification, to the effect that
> the prohibition of reserved function names applies only to their use in
> function calls, and not to their use in function declarations.
> 
> In other words, the WG decided that these test results for XQuery 1.0 are
> correct. 
> 
> (Personal comment: Since XQuery 3.0 introduces an incompatible change,
> however, it would be understandable if a vendor decides to implement the 3.0
> rules in a 1.0 processor...)

I have a question related to this comment: 
since the test-cases in question are marked with a dependency to "XQ10" is it
correct for a XQuery implementattion submitting results for XQuery 3.0 not to
run these test-cases?
Meaning that the results for these test-cases *don't* count for XQuery 3.0
conformance ?

My understanding is that for submitting results for XQuery 3.0 only test-cases
marked with "XQ10+", "XQ30" and "XQ30+" should matter.

Am I missing something here?

Doesn't "XQ10" dependency stand for XQuery 1.0 test-cases that *may be*
incompatible with XQuery 3.0 ?

Because this is not the case since the test-cases mentioned (although marked
with "XQ10" dependency) are taken into account when generating XQuery 3.0
conformance reports.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 23:45:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:43 UTC