- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 13:30:17 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21937 --- Comment #4 from Christian Gruen <christian.gruen@gmail.com> --- I am aware that it takes valuable time to commit the test case fixes, and I very much appreciate the work (mostly) done so far by you, O'Neil, and Tim. If everyone agrees, I’ll be glad to check in obvious fixes by my own. Regarding the validation of input documents, I observed that many test cases will yield correct results even if an attached schema is not evaluated. This is why I looked for the few remaining tests that have no explicit schema dependency. Otherwise, I believe, a test suite driver for an implementation without schema support would either have to ignore all tests that have any schema declaration included – which would be a pity – or try to evaluate a query, and check for a schema declaration if the query fails, and then assume that it failed because of schema support – which doesn’t seem too elegant. If there is another solution that I have omitted, and that is a better solution that explicit schema dependencies, feel free to tell me. I am sorry that the additional declarations have caused quite some extra effort, but I assume that there is now hardly any test left that lack an explicit schema dependency. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 13:30:23 UTC