- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 15:55:38 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19597
Christian Gruen <christian.gruen@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
CC| |christian.gruen@gmail.com
Resolution|FIXED |---
--- Comment #10 from Christian Gruen <christian.gruen@gmail.com> ---
For the test case "prohibit-module-1-s", I would propose to add XQST0059 as
potential result, as the option declaration may be evaluated after the import
of the module, thus yielding a "module not found" parsing error (and, as far as
I have seen, the spec. does not require that the options are evaluated in a
separate compiler step). As an alternative, the query could be modified to
point to an existing module.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 6 May 2013 15:55:39 UTC