- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 10:13:11 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21838 --- Comment #3 from Ghislain Fourny <g@28.io> --- Good catch, I added the module dependency, awaiting your confirmation that it works for you. I agree with Tim's comment 2, i.e., the WG made an explicit decision that it is okay for an implementation to activate a feature even if it had previously deactivated it following the dependency of false on that feature. It comes down to saying that a dependency of false does not mean that the feature must be "not supported" for the test to be run, but that it must be "not activated" by default for the test to be run. It is fine for an implementation that does support a feature to not run tests with a dependency of false on that feature, if it is unable to deactivate it, so I also agree with O'Neil's last sentence in comment 1. Does it make sense? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 2 May 2013 10:13:12 UTC