- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 09:45:39 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21838 --- Comment #2 from Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> --- (In reply to comment #1) > This in affect switches off the HOF feature in the implementation so any > call to require-feature on HOF should throw an error in the test case. I'm fairly sure that this isn't the expected behaviour. If the implementation can enable a feature in response to a require-feature, it is free to do so, and only raise an error if it can't. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 2 May 2013 09:45:41 UTC