[Bug 21558] dependency wrong for "format-date-en152" and "format-dateTime-en152"

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21558

Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |mike@saxonica.com
           Assignee|oneil@saxonica.com          |mike@saxonica.com

--- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ---
I don't agree.

These tests demonstrate that if the implementation does not support calendar
CB, it is expected to fall back to some other calendar such as AD. That is, the
test is explicitly designed to be run by processors that do NOT support
calendar="CB", which is what the metadata says.

One could argue for alternative results (there's nothing in the spec that
requires the fallback calendar to be "AD" or the word "Calendar" to be in
English) but we can add alternatives, or additional dependencies, when we find
products that make a different choice.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 1 May 2013 08:35:54 UTC