- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 18:39:17 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18861 --- Comment #5 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- The current status is that the grammar has been written up in the spec and appears satisfactory. Michael Dyck has pointed out that there's a technical ambiguity in the way it's constructed, because xx() can be both a function call and a kind-test; we probably have to disambiguate that by listing the allowed function names in the grammar rather than leaving it to an extra-grammatical rule. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 28 March 2013 18:39:21 UTC