- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:49:26 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21370 --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- Yes, I agree it's problematic. In my XSLT 2.0 book I say "ISO 8601 does not define a numbering for weeks within a month. You will have to see what your implementation returns". The difficulty is that [w] is available in XSLT 2.0, even though underspecified, so removing it has its own problems. We could (a) attempt a specification of what it means (b) say that the result is implementation-defined (c) say that it's implementation-defined whether [w] is supported (d) withdraw or deprecate it I'm going to specifically ask for XSL WG discussion of this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 22 March 2013 09:49:28 UTC