- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:50:23 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20949 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@gmail.com> --- I would like to merge these rules into bullet point 3 of 3.18 Validate Expressions: * If validation mode is strict, the validated element must have a top-level element declaration in the effective schema, and must conform to this declaration. * If validation mode is lax, the validated element must conform to its top-level element declaration if such a declaration exists in the effective schema. If validation mode is lax and there is no top-level element declaration for the element, and the element has an xsi:type attribute, then the xsi:type attribute must name a top-level type definition in the effective schema, and the element must conform to that type. * If a type name is specified in the validate expression, no attempt is made to locate an element declaration matching the name of the validated element; the element can have any name, and its content is validated against the named type. If the type name is xs:untyped, all elements will receive the type annotation xs:untyped, and all attributes will receive the type annotation xs:untypedAtomic. If the type name is xs:untypedAtomic, it checks that the node has no children, and the node receives the type annotation xs:untypedAtomic. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2013 16:50:24 UTC