- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 08:45:46 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19004 --- Comment #18 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- (In reply to comment #17) > Sorry for my jumping in late. I am wondering if the new results of the > following two test cases... > > format-integer-025: > format-integer(1500000, '#') > 1500000 > > format-integer-026 > format-integer(1500000, '#a') > 1500000 > > ...harmonize with the specification, which says that "there MUST be at least > one mandatory-digit-sign" in decimal-digit-patterns. Yes, they do, because the rule in question only applies when you have a "decimal digit pattern", and you only have a decimal digit pattern when the primary format token contains at least one digit. In fact, the rule cited is now always true by definition. > > Next, I am not sure where to spot the "default primary format" mentioned in > comment #15. I think comment #15 is using the phrase "default primary format token" to refer to the token used when this rule is invoked: "If an implementation does not support a numbering sequence represented by the given token, it must use a format token of 1." Which in this case means that "#" and "#a" are not errors, they are format tokens with an implementation-defined meaning, which is likely to be "1". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 11 March 2013 08:45:48 UTC