- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:31:25 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18861 --- Comment #6 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> --- Created attachment 1381 --> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=1381&action=edit Suggested improvements for the pattern syntax Here's a suggestion based on the remarks above to to keep the limitation on root functions in the pattern syntax. I've also renamed FunctionCallP, because it implies that we have replaced FunctionCall with FunctionCallP, which we haven't, in other places, FunctionCall is still allowed. While none of this is a syntactical ambiguity, perhaps you might consider this alternative syntax as an improvement. See attachment (the comment section makes the syntax almost unreadable). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 25 July 2013 15:31:29 UTC