- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:16:12 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20828 Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mike@saxonica.com --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- We need to say a little bit more than this. We need to say something about the validate expression. Either we say that a processor that does not support typed data must not support validate (that is, it must not support the schema-aware feature). Or we might allow a processor to support validate, but to do so in such a way that no type annotations are present in the result. Furthermore (and this is where the whole thing started), 3.9.1.3 ยง5.j says this: "If construction mode in the static context is strip, the type-name property is xs:untyped. On the other hand, if construction mode is preserve, the type-name property is xs:anyType." we should change this rule to say that if the typed data feature is not supported then the type is xs:untyped regardless of construction mode; or alternatively, to say that if the typed data feature is not supported then the construction mode must be strip. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 21:16:15 UTC