- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 22:05:11 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20674 --- Comment #2 from Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> --- We do byte-by-byte comparison of the serialised result against the expected result. To get around the problem, we serialise the result both with \n and \r\n and try the comparison with each. Is it safe to replace a 13 10 byte sequence with 10 without reference to the text encoding, or would we have to use the output encoding to decode the byte stream, do the character replacement, then re-encode to a byte stream? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2013 22:05:12 UTC