- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:24:02 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20634 --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- On reflection, I don't think that prohibiting xs:error would save any work for implementors, because the behaviour is exactly the same as a user-defined union type with no member types, and implementations need to support that anyway. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2013 14:24:03 UTC