- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:16:59 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17480 --- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- We also need to consider type="xs:untypedAtomic". The decision here is that we should validate as for type="xs:string" (that is, check there are no element children) and then mark the node as xs:untypedAtomic. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 11 February 2013 15:17:05 UTC