- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 05:30:22 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23923
--- Comment #6 from Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> ---
(In reply to Michael Dyck from comment #4)
> > 4. Incorrect conversion of eqname-009.
> >
> > Q{ http://www.example.com/ ns }b
> >
> > is converted to
> >
> > <xqx:nameTest xqx:URI=" http://www.example.com/ ns ">b</xqx:nameTest>
>
> I'm pretty sure that's a valid conversion, because it back-converts to
> exactly the original URIQualifiedName.
>
>
> > but should probably be
> >
> > <xqx:nameTest xqx:URI="http://www.example.com/ ns">b</xqx:nameTest>
>
> I believe that too would be a valid conversion, because it back-converts to
> a URIQualifiedName that, although lexically different from the original, is
> semantically the same.
>
> Does the Working Group have a preference?
True. As an aside, I note that xqx:URI is an xs:string, and wonder why it's
not an anyURI.
I'll change our XQueryX processor to perform the normalization.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2013 05:30:24 UTC